Tuesday, May 17, 2011

An interesting question

I have some good responses for Aaron's gun essay but haven't taken the time to post them, but I wanted to throw this out there before it is forgotten. Chris Wallace asked Tom Donalin http://dailycaller.com/2011/05/09/chris-wallace-shooting-bin-laden-in-the-head-is-ok-but-not-waterboarding-ksm/

WALLACE: I’m not asking you why it was OK to shoot Usama bin Laden. I fully understand the threat. And I’m not second-guessing the SEALs.

DONILON: Right.

WALLACE: What I am second guessing is, if that’s OK, why can’t you do waterboarding? What can’t you do enhanced interrogation of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, who was just as bad an operator as Usama bin Laden?

DONILON: Because, well, our judgment is that it’s not consistent with our values, not consistent and not necessary in terms of getting the kind of intelligence that we need.

WALLACE: But shooting bin Laden in the head is consistent with our values?

DONILON: We are at war with Usama bin Laden.

WALLACE: We’re at war with Khalid Sheikh Mohammed.


In the light of our prior debate on waterboarding and current debate on gun control, I have two questions, #1 what do you think about the SEALS shooting Osama? FYI: I have no problem with it. #2 if that’s OK, why can’t you do waterboarding? What can’t you do enhanced interrogation of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, who was just as bad an operator as Usama bin Laden?(stolen from Chris Wallace)